How to launch an ICO in Switzerland

Launching an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) in Switzerland is governed by a flexible, case-specific statutory approach managed by the Federal Fiscal Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA). Rather than imposing a single, rigid framework, FINMA assesses each project individually, allowing for tailored guidance contingent on the nature and perils of each venture. Swiss legislation, including the Fiscal Markets Supervisory Act (FMAG) and the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA), both supports the growth of cryptocurrency initiatives and mandates strict abidance to security and data protection protocols. The canton of Zug, often called "Crypto Valley," has become a prominent hub for blockchain companies, renowned for its progressive lawful ambience and openness to pecuniary innovation. This statutory and cultural landscape positions Switzerland as an attractive destination for crypto-contingent schemes.

Advantages of launching an ICO in Switzerland

Switzerland’s supportive statutory ambience is a major factor attracting international cryptocurrency startups. Central to this framework is FINMA, which has established thorough and adaptable guidelines for blockchain schemes. FINMA’s directives are not only flexible but also specific to each scheme, enhancing Switzerland’s appeal to emerging fintech ventures.

To provide clarity on conformance prerequisites, FINMA categorises ICO tokens into three types: remittance tokens, utility tokens, and securities. This classification helps determine the certified status and obligations of a scheme contingent on its specific features and goals. For example, remittance tokens are treated similarly to digital currencies, whereas utility tokens grant ingress to specific services or products. This categorisation reduces statutory ambiguity, which is crucial for endeavours operating in the unpredictable crypto mercantile.

An additional cornerstone of the Swiss directive is the AMLA. ICO schemes, particularly those raising capital internationally, must abide with stringent clientele identification and AML routines. These prerequisites not only shield the company from potential certified issues but also enhance backer confidence domestically and internationally, which is vital for the global growth of an E-money venture.

Switzerland’s approach balances innovation with backer protection, creating an optimal statutory ambience for digital opulent activities. The FMAG, in particular, ensures transpicuous and consistent conditions for crypto initiatives.

Excise efficiency and incentives

Corporate tax rates in Switzerland vary by canton, generally ranging between 12% and 24%. The taxation of tokens is regulated under the Federal Tax Service Law (DBG), which recognises distinctions among token types. As such, utility tokens may benefit from lower excise rates compared to tokens classified as securities, offering startups an opportunity to manage costs and optimize capital at different stages of their development.

Income generated from E-money transactions is also carefully regulated, allowing for more favourable excise conditions for both Swiss residents and foreign financiers. This lenient excise ambience makes Switzerland attractive not only to crypto firms but also to those seeking advantageous conditions for the taxation of their digital assets.

Switzerland’s thriving E-money sphere

The Zug region, known globally as Crypto Valley, is a unique ambience for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. Since the early 2010s, Zug has attracted blockchain innovators from across the globe, benefiting from both governmental support and Switzerland’s commitment to pecuniary technology advancement.

Crypto Valley provides a thorough ecosystem for blockchain ventures, supporting everything from certified advice and technical assistance to ingress to venture capital. Strategic partnerships between the private sect and government agencies have fostered an endeavour-friendly atmosphere, empowering entrepreneurs and endeavours in the crypto sphere.

Zug also hosts international conferences and forums dedicated to blockchain and E-money, offering a platform for networking, knowledge exchange, and collaboration with leading experts worldwide. Furthermore, Swiss banks, known for their stability, are beginning to offer E-money handling services, further cementing Zug’s position as a global leader in the crypto and blockchain industry.

Registering a company for an ICO in Switzerland

Generating a firm base through the appropriate organisation model and abidance to statutory norms are crucial sequences for a successful ICO project in Switzerland. The Swiss government supplies a broad scope of lawful entity options for startups, each tailored to distinct endeavour needs and prerequisites.

Opting the proper lawful entity

The prime recommended organisation structures in the polity for launching an ICO are the joint-stock company (AG) and the limited liability company (GmbH). Each of these lawful forms presents distinct merits and considerations, which can influence the choice for financiers embarking on ICOs.

Joint-Stock company (AG)

A JSC, known as "AG" in Switzerland, is often preferred for ICO projects with substantial capital and ambitious investment goals. For an AG, the initial money prerequisites is 50,000 Swiss francs, with this amount rising to 100,000 francs for a publicly traded AG. This capital can be partially contributed through organisation assets, such as intellectual property, or resources, offering a solid base that can foster backer confidence and establish credibility.

The governance model of an AG comprises a general meeting of financiers and a handling board. At least one member of the management board must be a Swiss resident, ensuring that the enterprise maintains effective oversight of its lawful and pecuniary activities within the territory. Prime merits of an AG include robust shareholder protections and the capacity to attract large-scale investments, which are particularly advantageous for ICOs focused on resource extraction or major infrastructure schemes where substantial investment is necessary.

Limited Liability Company (GmbH)

A limited liability company, or GmbH, requires a lower minimum capital investment of 20,000 Swiss francs, making it more ingressible for smaller ventures. Although ICOs often prefer the AG structure, the GmbH is a flexible alternative for schemes with more modest investment needs. Like the AG, a GmbH must appoint at least one director who resides in Switzerland. However, the GmbH's governance structure is generally simpler, which may be an asset for ICO schemes that do not require extensive backer involvement or formalities.

Choosing Between AG and GmbH

The decision between an AG and a GmbH largely depends on the ICO’s scale and funding prerequisites. For Swiss ICO schemes targeting large investments, particularly in sects such as natural resource extraction or substantial infrastructure development, the AG format is ideal due to its capacity to handle significant capital and protect shareholders. Conversely, for smaller-scale schemes, a GmbH may offer greater flexibility with less stringent formalities, appealing to startups with limited capital prerequisites.

Finally, generating the appropriate lawful structure for an ICO in Switzerland mandates careful appraisal of the scheme’s investment needs and governance preferences.

Criterion

AG

GmbH

Minimum amount of approved capital

CHF 100,000

CHF 20,000

Control

Oversight teams and financiers are not necessitated to participate in oversight.

Owners can also be managers

Publication of data about owners

Information about financiers is not indicated in the commercial register, except for the ultimate beneficial owners - they are in the register

The names of the owners are listed in the commercial register.

Residency prerequisites

At least one member of the board must have the residence permit of the region

At least one director must have the status of a resident of the state

Using shares

Shares are easily transferable, making AGs preferable for bigger firms.

Stakes are conveyed with limitations

Expediency

Suitable for large companies raising capital through share issuance

More often used for SMEs endeavours

To register an ICO company in Switzerland, whether as an AG (Joint Stock Company) or GmbH (Limited Liability Company), opening a capitalisation account is an initial and compulsory phase. This account is necessitated to hold the capital needed to cover the enterprise’s authorised share capital before registration. Both company types also require a physical office within Switzerland and abidance to excise directives, which can vary according to the chosen canton.

Mandatory indenture and statutory conformance

Launching an ICO in Switzerland involves strict statutory abidance and thorough documentation to ensure conformance with the lawful and pecuniary framework surrounding digital assets.

Enterprise registration and lawful structure

The enrollment sequence typically requires forming an AG or GmbH, as these lawful structures are well-suited to raising funds via token sales. Necessary founding indentures will be conveyed to the prime Swiss supervisors, marking the official incorporation of the ICO enterprise.

Whitepaper: A detailed whitepaper is essential for launching an ICO. This indenture should clearly outline the scheme’s objectives, token usage model, technical framework, and conformance with the FINMA token classification. The whitepaper serves as a key reference for potential financiers and regulators, detailing how tokens will be generated and what stakeholders can expect.

Licensing with FINMA

Before proceeding with an ICO launch, companies must submit an enrollment to FINMA (Swiss Fiscal Market Supervisory Authority) to secure the appropriate permit. FINMA evaluates the lawful standing of the issued tokens and specifies whether the ICO will require pecuniary statutory conformance.

Lawful prerequisites and licensing

  • Permit enrollment: For tokens classified as securities, obtaining a permit under Swiss fiscal law is mandatory. If the ICO issues securities-like tokens, it must abide by the Swiss Code of Obligations (OR) and the Fiscal Market Infrastructure Act (FMIA).
  • AML and KYC conformance: ICO companies must abide by Switzerland’s AMLA. This entails robust KYC routines to verify backer identities and monitor for illicit pecuniary transactions.
Token Issuance Documentation

For ICOs involving security tokens, extensive documentation is necessitated:

  • Prospectus: Security tokens necessitate the arrangement of a brochure, similar to those for traditional shares and bonds. The brochure should outline the token’s prerogatives, obligations, and pecuniary disclosures, in conformance with FINMA and public document norms.
  • Terms of Token Issuance: Companies must also create documentation specifying acquisition terms, use, and token prerogatives, providing clear terms for all participants.

Statutory interaction with FINMA

Switzerland has established ICO directives under FINMA to promote transparency, mitigate threat, and enhance backer confidence. FINMA’s token classification system and AML routines aim to create a reliable ambience for digital asset schemes.

Token classification under Swiss norms

Switzerland recognises three main token types as part of its statutory framework, each with distinct conformance obligations:

  1. Payment tokens: Payment tokens act as a digital means of exchange and are not designed to offer financiers profit or governance prerogatives. However, AML statutes mandate that these tokens be monitored to prevent illicit activities, and conformance is governed by the Fiscal Markets Act (FMAG).
  2. Utility tokens: Utility tokens provide ingress to a firm’s products or services, similar to a permit. Swiss authorities view utility tokens as less likely to be used for investment purposes. Still, companies must demonstrate these tokens are used strictly for platform or service ingress, especially in sects like resource oversight.
  3. Security Tokens: These tokens represent an interest in a firm’s income or assets, classifying them similarly to shares or pecuniary assets. The Swiss Securities Act (OR) regulates security tokens strictly, with obligations on registration, disclosure, and AML/KYC norms. For example, tokens linked to mineral or wherewithal-backed projects would require extensive conformance with backer protection and pecuniary integrity statutes.

AML directives

Switzerland places a strong emphasis on AML conformance in the ICO and E-money sects. ICO companies are necessitated to abide by the AMLA, implementing KYC checks to verify backer backgrounds and prevent illicit activities.

  • KYC routines: Every participant in a Swiss ICO must complete KYC verification, which includes submitting personal and pecuniary indentures. This requirement reduces the threat of token misuse for criminal activities, such as terrorism financing or illicit trade.
  • Transaction monitoring: Under AMLA, ICO firms must monitor transactions for irregularities and report suspicious activities. This is particularly vital for projects with high-value transactions, such as those related to resource-based assets. Automated monitoring systems can flag unusual transaction patterns, further preventing pecuniary misconduct.
  • FINMA registration: ICOs issuing tokens classified under AMLA’s jurisdiction must register with FINMA. This registration certifies that the ICO complies with Swiss pecuniary statutes and enhances its credibility in the international mercantile.

Importance of token classification in Switzerland

Clear token classification is pivotal for a successful ICO launch in Switzerland. With FINMA’s guidance and strict AML measures, Switzerland has earned a reputation as a secure jurisdiction for digital assets, whether for high-tech ventures or innovative projects within the global mercantile. The statutory ambience fosters speculator trust and provides a stable framework for ICO ventures, from token issuance to large-scale pecuniary operations.

Developing a White Paper for an ICO in Switzerland

A White Paper is a strategic and essential indenture that meticulously outlines a project intended for launch through an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) in Switzerland. Far from being just a technical summary, it presents a thorough trade model crafted to attract interest from financiers and partners. For endeavours in the cryptocurrency or DLT sects, the White Paper is essentially the project’s documentation. A thoroughly developed White Paper is crucial in building credibility and trust with prospective financiers and stakeholders, as it communicates the project’s feasibility and potential.

Project description

The project description section of the White Paper should give a concise yet compelling overview of the project, detailing the specific problems it addresses and explaining why its realisation is valuable. For instance, if the ICO project in Switzerland pertains to natural resource extraction, this section should highlight any unique features, such as advanced technologies that improve resource handling or a real-time monitoring platform for mineral resources. The aim is to convince financiers of the project’s opulent and technological benefits, demonstrating how it surpasses existing solutions.

Project objectives

Project objectives must be clearly defined, with measurable outcomes. For example, a startup in the mineral resources sect in Angola might aim to expedite the exploration of resource deposits or enhance production efficiency through innovative technologies. The objectives should illustrate how the project will address current industry challenges and how the funds raised will be used to achieve these aims. Specificity here reassures financiers of the project’s practical approach to solving relevant issues.

Technical specifications

One of the most crucial parts of the White Paper is a thorough explanation of the project’s technical framework. This section should specify the blockchain technologies underpinning the project, detail how smart contracts function, and clarify token interactions. For an ICO related to natural resource handling, it is essential to describe how blockchain will ensure transparency in supply chain handling or improve the efficiency of resource extraction processes. An accurate technical depiction reassures financiers of the project's reliability and operational soundness.

Economic model

The opulent model section should illustrate the long-term pecuniary strategy behind the project. This includes explaining how tokens will be utilised within the project ecosystem, the benefits token holders can expect, and the mechanisms available for financiers to monetise their holdings. Outlining these elements provides insight into the potential return on investment, making the project more attractive to financiers by demonstrating its sustainability and profitability.

Lawful considerations

Launching an ICO in Switzerland involves meeting strict statutory prerequisites, which has made the country a secure and appealing jurisdiction for E-money initiatives. Swiss directives are structured to safeguard both the ventures and financiers, which is particularly valuable in high-threat industries like natural resource handling. Swiss statutes govern the token issuance process and offer opportunities to minimise excise liabilities, making this jurisdiction highly advantageous for startups aiming to attract substantial investment.

Statutory conformance prerequisites

To conduct a successful ICO in Switzerland, a firm must adhere to several conformance stages regulated by the FINMA. The initial requirement is firm registration, which can take the form of an Aktiengesellschaft (AG) or Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH). Opting the proper lawful entity is vital for aligning with the ICO's goals and securing investment effectively.

A formal enrollment to FINMA is also mandatory, as the authority assesses the project for conformance with Switzerland’s pecuniary statutes. FINMA will evaluate the types of tokens to be issued and any associated lawful perils. Contingent on the nature of these tokens, the firm may also be necessitated to obtain additional permits to ensure statutory conformity.

As part of Switzerland’s efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, all ICO projects must implement robust KYC and AML protocols, which include verifying the identity of all ICO participants.

Post-ICO, ventures are expected to submit periodic pecuniary reports adhering to Swiss accounting norms. This level of transparency is particularly significant for firms in the natural resource sect, such as those engaged in mining in Angola, where operational clarity is a priority.

Key facets of token classification

Token classification is a basic component of the ICO directive in Switzerland. FINMA categorises tokens into three primary types: remittance tokens, utility tokens, and security tokens.

  • Payment tokens: These tokens serve as a medium of exchange, much like digital currencies, and are regulated as pecuniary assets.
  • Utility tokens: Designed to grant ingress to a firm’s services or products, utility tokens do not fall under pecuniary instrument directives. For instance, in a mineral resource handling project, utility tokens might allow holders to ingress a platform for tracking mining activities or to purchase resources directly through the blockchain.
  • Security tokens: These tokens function as securities, granting financiers a stake in the firm or prerogatives over profit distribution. Swiss statute mandates that all security tokens be registered with FINMA and abide by Swiss securities directives under the Swiss Code of Obligations (Obligationenrecht, OR).
Excise implications for crypto projects

Taxation for ICOs in Switzerland distinguishes contingent on the form of tokens issued and the pecuniary nature of the transactions. Primary impost considerations include income impost, VAT, and impost on dividends.

  • Income tax: Swiss ventures running ICOs may be subjugated to income excise on the revenue generated from token sales. The rate varies by canton but typically ranges between 12% and 24%.
  • VAT: Companies that issue utility tokens granting ingress to digital services or platforms are generally subjugated to VAT at the Swiss standard rate of 7.7% for ICOs. Payment tokens, designed as currency equivalents, are VAT-exempt; however, transactions involving them may incur corporate income excise if they are recognised as firm assets.

Switzerland’s flexible excise policies allow crypto projects to minimise taxes through strategic token structuring. Companies can optimize their excise obligations by choosing favourable jurisdictions outside Switzerland and by designing tokens in ways that support excise efficiency.

By adhering to these structured processes and statutory norms, companies launching an ICO in Switzerland can increase their appeal to financiers, ensuring a robust foundation for project growth and long-term success.

Attracting investments via Initial Coin Offerings (ICO)

An ICO is a progressive approach to crowdfunding, enabling organisations to secure capital by selling digital assets known as tokens. Built upon blockchain technology, this model allows organisations to lure speculations more rapidly and to engage a broader range of financiers globally.

How ICOs attract investment

Launching an ICO in Switzerland serves as a highly efficient crowdfunding mechanism, wherein ventures issue tokens in exchange for E-money or traditional fiat currency. Unlike conventional fundraising approaches, an ICO operates through a decentralised system, minimising transaction costs and accelerating the funding process.

The crowdfunding model explained

In traditional venture funding, startups typically rely on a small number of major financiers, which entails significant lawful expenses and protracted negotiations. ICOs, by contrast, allow ventures to raise capital from a wider audience, including individual financiers. This ingressibility enables a greater range of financiers to purchase tokens that may offer utility within the project’s ecosystem or grant prerogatives to profits.

Advantages of ICOs Over traditional fundraising

One of the primary benefits of launching an ICO in Switzerland is to an international speculator pool. Unlike Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) or other traditional models, ICOs do not require substantial upfront costs for conformance verification. By issuing digital tokens directly to financiers worldwide, ICOs bypass many statutory and logistical obstacles associated with traditional capital raising.

Reducing intermediaries for efficiency

An ICO framework in Switzerland eliminates the need for intermediaries such as pecuniary institutions and advisors, reducing associated fees and expediting the overall funding timeline. This model is especially beneficial in sects like mineral resource development, where rapid capital acquisition is crucial to minimise project costs. Blockchain technology underpins the ICO process, allowing direct transactions between the organisation and its financiers, which enhances transparency and reduces threat for all parties involved.

The table will help you understand how the ICO launched in Switzerland provides a faster, more flexible and global way to raise investment compared to traditional methods.

Criterion

ICO

Traditional methods (IPO, venture capital)

The sequence of raising capital

Tokens are sold to financiers around the globe via crowdfunding. The process is often automated and decentralized.

Involves complex routines with intermediaries (banks, exchanges). Registration and underwriting are necessitated

Speed of capital raising

The sequence can take many weeks, contingent on the arrangement of the project and White Paper.

Can take years owing to the need to complete complex lawful and pecuniary routines

Transaction costs

Usually lower, since there are no intermediaries, and blockchain technologies allow for automation of processes

High, includes bankers' fees, lawful costs, listing fees

Attracting financiers

Both large and small financiers can participate in ICOs, which expands the funding base

Limited primarily to institutional and accredited financiers

Flexibility and innovation

The ability to experiment with different tokens (utility, security), create new financing models

A more rigid structure, limited to traditional methods such as shares or debt instruments

Global speculator engagement

One of the significant advantages of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) in Switzerland is their ability to attract financiers from around the globe, unrestricted by geographical or currency limitations. Blockchain technology, which operates independently of borders and currency barriers, facilitates this reach, making it possible for ventures to draw investments from international backers. For organisations working on cross-border projects—such as mining operations in Angola—this international speculator appeal opens doors to a considerably larger pool of capital compared to traditional financing options.

Broad-Based funding from global financiers

Owing to blockchain’s decentralised infrastructure, financiers worldwide can participate in financing a project by purchasing tokens, making ICOs highly advantageous for capital-intensive sects. Projects within the natural resource industry, for instance, often require substantial funding to build infrastructure and adopt new technology. By launching an ICO in Switzerland, ventures can attract financiers far beyond local sources, enabling the financing of large-scale industrial projects and construction initiatives with a global capital base.

Borderless transactions via blockchain

Blockchain enables seamless, cross-border transactions that bypass conventional pecuniary systems, allowing ventures to raise funds internationally without the need to conform to local banking restrictions. For example, a mineral extraction firm in Angola could gather investments from individuals and firms around the world, regardless of currency control policies. ICO transactions on blockchain are transpicuous and easily auditable, instilling confidence in financiers—an essential factor for industries like mining, where transparency and accountability are paramount.

Asset tokenization for enhanced liquidity

ICOs enable ventures to digitise real assets through tokenization, boosting liquidity by making these tokens tradeable on global exchanges. This liquidity is particularly appealing to both short- and long-term financiers, as it offers flexibility in terms of entry and exit points. Thus, launching an ICO in Switzerland provides a compelling opportunity for financiers to engage in projects with liquid assets and aligns well with varied investment strategies.

Streamlined Crowdfunding with ICOs

Blockchain-based ICOs eliminate the need for intermediaries, enabling ventures to raise capital faster, reduce transaction costs, and ensure transparency. For industrial enterprises, this streamlined approach opens new avenues for financing large-scale projects, connecting them with an international speculator base and reducing traditional obstacles to capital acquisition.

Primary perils and mitigation strategies

Launching an ICO in Switzerland, like any investment method, comes with various perils, some of which could impact the project's success and lawful conformance. The perils are even more pronounced in the natural resources sect owing to statutory complexities and the need to attract a broad speculator base. Switzerland, known for its transpicuous and robust statutory framework, offers effective ways to manage these perils.

Fraud and AML perils
Switzerland’s open ICO platform appeals to both legitimate financiers and individuals with potential malicious intent, such as those engaging in money laundering or fraud. To combat this, the Swiss AMLA mandates strict KYC protocols and transaction monitoring for all ventures involved in ICOs. For high-value industries like mining, which often involve multi-million-dollar investments, transparency and transaction tracking are critical. ICOs registered in Switzerland must ensure complete transparency in transactions and monitor funding origins to avoid fraudulent schemes. AMLA requires that all ICO transactions are recorded and traceable on the blockchain, aiding in fraud prevention and conformance.
Transaction monitoring measures
Swiss statute also requires firms to monitor for suspicious transactions, a vital measure for ventures in resource-heavy sects that engage in substantial cross-border transactions. This monitoring aids in identifying potentially illicit pecuniary activity, thereby protecting both the company and its financiers from lawful perils.
Anti-fraud precautions
To mitigate fraud perils, Swiss ICO projects frequently use smart contracts, which automatically execute agreements upon meeting predetermined conditions. By automating ICO processes, smart contracts reduce human error and ensure tokens are only distributed to financiers once all ICO prerequisites are satisfied.
Lawful and pecuniary threat handling
Both lawful and pecuniary perils can significantly impact the launch and long-term viability of an ICO. Missteps in lawful registration or unanticipated pecuniary obligations may lead to project failure or statutory intervention. Switzerland categorizes tokens into three types—remittance tokens, utility tokens, and security tokens—each subjugated to different directives. Misclassifying security tokens as utility tokens, for instance, could trigger lawful issues, as securities are governed by stricter rules.

Pecuniary perils, such as E-money volatility, can also affect funds raised during an ICO. This is especially concerning for ventures aiming to use ICO capital for substantial projects, such as mineral extraction. To manage these perils, ventures may adopt asset-backed tokens or hedging strategies to shield ICO capital from market fluctuations.

Another pecuniary threat arises from undervaluing tokens during the ICO planning phase. Underestimating token value may result in insufficient capital to realise project goals. To mitigate this, a thorough market analysis and robust opulent model are essential, accounting for all projected company activities and potential revenue streams.

Abidance to international norms
For projects that seek to engage international financiers, particularly in the natural resources sect, conformance with multiple lawful frameworks is critical. Professional pecuniary and lawful consultants help ensure projects meet international directives, minimising the threat of lawful disputes or pecuniary penalties.

Successfully launching an ICO through FINMA in Switzerland necessitates a thorough threat evaluation of lawful and pecuniary facets. Swiss statute provides a stable lawful ambience for ICO registration, ensuring ventures have a well-defined statutory foundation that supports sustainable project development.

Final word

Switzerland has established itself as a premier destination for Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), thanks to its distinct combination of solidity, resilient lawful protections, and forward-thinking statutory sphere. For firms in complex and evolving sects, opting the proper ICO jurisdiction is a crucial strategic choice, shaping the overall accomplishment and viability of the project. The territory presents an ideal setting for the inception and growth of E-money ventures, backed by a dependable lawful structure, adaptable excise policies, and an endeavor-friendly ambience.

This country's appeal to E-money projects is particularly strong in capital-intensive fields such as mining and resource handling, where the need for statutory clarity and speculator confidence is paramount. With careful arrangement, statutory abidance, and a solid pecuniary blueprint, launching an ICO in Switzerland provides a dependable and promising route to securing international investment. Such an approach can pave the way for new growth opportunities for both startups and established corporations, positioning them to thrive in the global marketplace.

Service order form
Name
The field must be filled
Email
Please enter a valid e-mail
How can we contact you?*
Phone
Please enter a valid phone number
messenger
The field must be filled
Your comment