Trademark registration in Hong Kong

Trademark enrollment in Hong Kong furnishes unparalleled prospects to safeguard the insignia within one of the preeminent Asiatic marketplaces. This endeavor is indispensable for indigenous and international enterprises striving to fortify their proprietary cerebral privileges in a territory renowned for its unwavering juridical framework and propitious commercial milieu.

Trademark: what is it and how does it protect a business?

A hallmark is an distinctive emblem crafted to facilitate the identification of a trademark's merchandise or provisions. It may encompass a lexeme, appellation, emblematic insignia, hue amalgamation, motto, or even aural cues.

Enrollment safeguards the badge from illicit appropriation by external entities and enables the proprietor to pursue juridical recourse if their prerogatives are infringed. Moreover, it may transform into a coveted chattel that augments the enterprise's worth and unlocks avenues for franchisement or licensure prospects.

Advantages of Brand Inscription in Hong Kong

Merits of insignia inscription in Hong Kong via indigenous intermediaries

For global entities bereft of a tangible foothold in Hong Kong, synergy with indigenous envoys may constitute a pivotal facet of triumphant insignia codification. Let us scrutinize the principal rationales underscoring its utility.

Classification of trademarks in Hong Kong

Fundamental categories of marks inscribed in Hong Kong:

• verbal – incorporate singular terms, glyphs, numerals, or amalgamations thereof;
• fine art – comprise patterns, sigils, insignias, or other pictorial components;
• combined – amalgamate verbal and emblematic constituents;
• three-dimensional – encompass the contour or encasement of the commodities if they possess distinguishing traits;
• sound — comprise of distinctive tones or harmonies;
• color signs — the application of particular hues or amalgamations thereof;
• olfactory — gustatory sensations which may be recorded as trademarks if they are able to differentiate the commodities of one entity from another.
• certification – employed to signify that the product conforms to specific criteria of excellence, provenance, or other attributes defined by the proprietor of the insignia.
• collective – Pertaining to entities or coalitions, these are utilized by their affiliates to denote affiliation within a particular collective.

Additional particulars concerning the inscription of trademarks may be discovered on the authoritative portal of the Hong Kong Intellectual Property Bureau.

Prerequisites and manuscripts for the inscription of a trademark in Hong Kong

Petitioning for mark inscription necessitates the assemblage of a precise array of papers and adherence to an assortment of stipulations.

Catalogue of requisite manuscripts

Conditions for foreign companies

Extranational establishments may procure a brand insignia in Hong Kong sans constituting a local envoy office or progeny, simplifying the procedure and safeguarding their entitlements without constituting an indigenous legal entity.

If a foreign enterprise does not intend to solicit directly, it may employ the assistance of a regional envoy or delegate to engage with the Register of Marks.

The Trade Marks Ordinance (Chapter 559) and Trade Marks Rules (Cap. 559A) regulate interrogations concerning brand notation within the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

The Procedure for the Enlistment of Trademarks in Hong Kong

Invariably, the modus operandi for inscribing a Mark in Hong Kong extends from six months to a full annum.

Expenditure for the registration of a trade emblem in Hong Kong

Use of a trademark in Hong Kong and labeling

Post enrolment, the emblem ought to be employed in congruence with the asserted portrayal and the categories of commodities and services delineated in the submission. Erroneous employment, such as altering iconography or utilizing the emblem for disparate classifications, may precipitate juridical repercussions, encompassing conceivable forfeiture of entitlements to the emblem. Should the insignia not be perpetually utilized for a triennium absent justifiable grounds, a potential annulment of its enrolment may occur as a consequence of an external entity lodging a plea for non-utilization.

In Hong Kong, proprietors of trade names possess the entitlement to affix their insignia with the glyph “®” solely following the formal finalization of enrollment. Employing this glyph sans authorization is unlawful and may incur pecuniary penalties. To procure a certificate of registration, corporations may employ the “TM” emblem to denote a label as a trademark, which signifies an aspiration to enroll it, yet affords no juridical safeguard.

Proprietors of marques may cede the prerogative to utilize their insignia to extraneous entities via sublicensing or concession. Subsequently, it is requisite to formulate a pact of authorization, which enumerates the stipulations for utilization and the oversight of the caliber of wares or services proffered under said emblem. This methodology aids in safeguarding the emblem from the adulteration of its esteem and preserves the caliber paradigms anticipated by patrons.

Using a Trademark for Tax Planning in Hong Kong

In financial strategizing, employing an appurtenant epithet is a formidable stratagem for alleviating the fiscal encumbrance and orchestrating licensure for transnational conglomerates. Such methodologies harbor auspicious potential in Hong Kong, owing to the metropolis' enticing fiscal ordinance and sophisticated intellectual property milieu.

Origination of cognitive property and consolidating corporation

A prevalent methodology involves the formation of a consortium in Hong Kong that possesses the inscribed trade symbols and other assets of cognitive property. Such a corporation may authorize insignias to subordinate entities or affiliated establishments globally. Royalties procured by the consortium are liable to corporate levy at a percentage of 16.5%, one of the most diminutive percentages in the vicinity. Furthermore, Hong Kong refrains from imposing a levy on dividends, permitting earnings to be proficiently reinvested.

License fees and royalties

Remunerations for emblematic utilization are facilitated by the registration of a trademark in Hong Kong, which possesses the capacity to ameliorate pecuniary restrictions. Fiscal sustenance may be curtailed for subsidiaries in jurisdictions with elevated levies should they remit their obligations to the Hong Kong principal entity. Evading discord with revenue officials is attainable through adherence to transfer pricing protocols.

Safeguarding and governance of cognitive assets

Hong Kong affords juridical safeguarding for registered emblems, enabling enterprises to securely administer and empower symbols without peril of relinquishment or misuse, fostering steady licensing revenue and alleviating emblem infringement hazards.

Any questions?

Contact our specialists

Send your application

Taxation of trademarks in Hong Kong

Hong Kong boasts a diminished corporate levy compared to other realms, set at 16.5% for enterprises and 15% for non-residents. It is noteworthy that the notion of territorial taxation prevails in this jurisdiction, signifying that solely income derived within Hong Kong is liable to imposition.

A modicum of latitude remains in the fiscal ramifications of brandmark concession in Hong Kong. To optimize pecuniary relief for worldwide licensing pacts, emoluments accrued in Hong Kong are liable to the metropolis's standard revenue levy.

Furthermore, Hong Kong has forged an array of bilateral tax accords, which bestow enterprises with the prospect of alleviating the fiscal encumbrance on sublicensing and remuneration revenue.

Trademark Safeguarding in Hong Kong

Trademark safeguarding in Hong Kong sans granting licensure is a pivotal undertaking for proprietors who aim to preserve the distinctiveness and juridical efficacy of their marque. This procedure necessitates an all-encompassing methodology, encompassing market surveillance, actions to quell infringements, and the employment of juridical devices to shield against unlawful appropriation.

For efficacious trademark safeguarding, Proprietors ought to incessantly surveil the marketplace for illicit exploitation of their mark by externals. This encompasses scrutinizing digital mercantile platforms, promotional endeavors, as well as corporeal retail establishments to uncover forgery, replication, or unapproved utilization. Consistent surveillance aids in recognizing transgressions promptly and adopting fitting countermeasures to avert prospective detriment to the mark’s renown.

If transgressions are discerned, the mark proprietor may undertake numerous actions to safeguard their prerogatives. Specifically, dispatch desist-and-refrain admonitions cautioning one to cease the illicit utilization. Should the infringer remain unresponsive, the proprietor may initiate litigation pursuing an injunction, reparations, or alternative indemnificatory recourses. These juridical implements render it feasible to secure brand safeguarding in Hong Kong from unlawful exploitation and preserve its renown within the commercial sphere.

Although not mandated in Hong Kong, substantiation of trademark employment to ensure its continuance, systematic preservation of its usage may function as a crucial element of protection. In the event of disputes or attempts to revoke a registration due to lack of usage, offering evidence of a commercial emblem will aid the holder in bolstering their position and defending their rights to it. Documenting utilization involves retaining advertising relics, transaction logs, and ancillary particulars that validate the active deployment of the trademark in the marketplace.

The function of customs bodies in safeguarding brand insignia?

Hong Kong customs officers uphold intellectual property prerogatives, thwarting fraudulent merchandise, maintaining brand sanctity, and enhancing consumer reliance by obliging trademark proprietors to present solicitations, verify particulars, and refresh details consistently.

The customs authority vigorously engages with global associates, facilitating the region's involvement in international endeavors to thwart counterfeiting. Affiliation with the World Customs Organization (WCO) and concords with foreign states augment the interchange of trademark and intellectual property transgression information. Contemporary innovations, including mechanized scrutiny mechanisms, label decipherers, synthetic cognition, and algorithmic progression, are vigorously employed to detect fraudulent merchandise during customs processing. These implements amplify precision and velocity of operations, mitigating the peril of bringing in counterfeit commodities.

To augment the efficacy of trademark safeguarding, customs entities administer pedagogical initiatives and colloquiums for commercial delegates. Proprietors of brands are furnished with counsel on the inscription of trademarks in Hong Kong, in addition to engagement with customs frameworks to discern infractions. Customs diligently collaborates with enterprises, furnishing communicative conduits for the swift transmission of intelligence regarding dubious merchandise and the formulation of collective defense tactics.

When spurious commodities are discerned, customs officials undertake resolute measures, encompassing apprehension and sequestration of illicit wares. Transgressors are indicted through judicial procedures, which may culminate in pecuniary sanctions and other juridical chastisements. These endeavors are augmented by collaborative inquiries with constabulary bodies to avert extensive counterfeit merchandise dissemination stratagems.

To appraise the efficacy of their endeavors, customs authorities sustain metrics of commodities scrutinized, the quantity of transgressions uncovered, and the outcomes of actions undertaken. Predicated on this information, dossiers are composed for the administration, commercial entities, and global collaborators, which facilitates the perpetual refinement of tactics and the incorporation of novel innovations to counteract forgery. This tiered safeguarding framework furnishes trademark proprietors with trustworthy circumstances for preserving brand esteem and enduring rivalry in both domestic and foreign marketplaces.

How protect your brand without registration in Hong Kong?

Possession of a certified insignia in Hong Kong affords considerable advantages in marque safeguarding, yet it is not invariably feasible or prudent to undergo the formal certification process. In these instances, one may employ substitute means of safeguarding predicated on the doctrines of inequitable rivalry. Notwithstanding the absence of formal certification, an efficacious system exists for asserting entitlements to a mark sans registration in Hong Kong via litigation concerning inequitable rivalry. Let us examine this procedure with greater scrutiny.

Basic mechanisms for protecting an unregistered trademark

Proprietors of marques may safeguard their entitlements through measures against unfair competition, striving to avert the employment of alternative insignias or emblems to mislead purchasers, depending on the marque's commercial prominence rather than official enrollment.

What is an unfair competition claim?

An unjust contest declaration is a juridical procedure wherein one faction exploits a symbol associated with another, intending to avert purchasers from being misled regarding the provenance of commodities or provisions, thus safeguarding equitable market rivalry.

For a triumphant instigation of an inequitable rivalry allegation in Hong Kong, three cardinal components must be substantiated.

The primordial and one of the most paramount requisites for instituting an unjust rivalry grievance in Hong Kong is substantiation of the complainant's renown. This signifies that the emblem or insignia must be discernible and linked with the particular commodities or services proffered by the petitioner. Renown can be corroborated in disparate manners:

• Marketing campaigns – vigorous brand advocacy via publicity, social platforms, and various communicative conduits;
• Participation in exhibitions and events – attendance at sectoral expositions and engagement in communal gatherings aids in bolstering notoriety;
• Customer reviews – favorable appraisals and endorsements from clientele manifest reliance on the establishment;
• Sales data – substantial trade figures may function as corroboration of an enterprise’s renown and stature.

If an enterprise effectively advertises a distinctive appellation or emblem that patrons correlate with superior commodities or provisions, it manifests the renown requisite to lodge a petition.

Deception or likelihood of misrepresentation

The second component is evidence that the defendant's deeds beguile or disinform purchasers. This might be realized by illustrating the application of analogous appellations, emblems, or other trademark components that could engender bewilderment among buyers regarding the provenance of the commodities. It is crucial to exhibit that such deeds infringe upon the tenets of equitable rivalry and delude the clientele..

For instance, if a litigant employs a designation that closely resembles a renowned marque or an emblem with analogous stylistic features, this could induce patrons to erroneously assume that the commodities or amenities are furnished by the progenitor enterprise, which constitutes a ground for legal recourse.

Causing damage

The tertiary component is verification of the genuine or prospective detriment that the complainant's enterprise might endure as a consequence of the respondent's deeds. Impairment manifests in numerous guises. Patrons might transition to the respondent's commodities or provisions due to their perception of affiliation with a renowned marque, or commerce could diminish by redirecting clientele to an adversary. Adverse linkages with spurious goods can impair the semblance of the authentic trade name.

Monetary reports, scrutiny of transactions prior to and subsequent to the inception of fraudulent commodities, and consumer appraisals denoting brand ambiguity may be employed to corroborate harm.

How file an unfair competition claim in Hong Kong?

The Unfair Competition Claim Process in Hong Kong includes several stages.

• Collection of evidence

First of all, it is necessary to collect all possible evidence confirming the existence of reputation, consumer deception and damage. These could be:

• documents about marketing campaigns (advertising materials, campaign reports, photos from events);
• customer reviews and testimonies (records of complaints, reviews on websites and social networks);
• financial data (sales reports, accounting documents confirming decrease in profits);
• examples of the defendant’s use of similar brand elements (photos of products, copies of logos and names).

• Contacting a law firm

To guarantee triumph, it is prudent to solicit juridical counsel from experts in intellectual assets and inequitable rivalry, who can evaluate prospective consequences, draft requisite paperwork, and advocate for the complainant's entitlements.

• Filing a claim in court

The assertion must elaborate on the contravention of non-registered insignia entitlements in Hong Kong, encompassing corroboration, requisitions, and restitution for harm and juridical expenses, and must be lodged in the pertinent territorial tribunal.

• Trial

The tribunal assesses contentions and proof, rendering a determination predicated on proof and statute. If favorable, it may proscribe contentious trademark components, indemnify litigants, and recompense judicial expenses.

Recommendations for owners of unregistered trademarks

To safeguard unregistered insignias in Hong Kong, proprietors ought to allocate resources to promotion, engage in expositions, furnish superior commodities, sustain publicity initiatives, preserve consumer feedback, uphold fiscal documentation, and confer with legal practitioners on brand fortification and intellectual property concerns.

Conclusion

Hong Kong provides a steadfast and adaptable juridical framework for enterprises aspiring to bolster their worldwide market stature. It affords fiscal and tax privileges, along with superior safeguarding of intellectual assets. From initiation to reinstatement, corporations secure a robust base for enduring growth and brand fortification. Our advisory firm assists entities in exploiting these prospects.